EEVACS Award Program

Definition of EEVACS

Effective:
Performing a desired service and/or providing a quality product that meets or exceeds customers' expectations.

Efficient:
Performing a desired service and/or providing a quality product that expends the least possible amount or resources (time, effort and expenditure); also, utilizing technological advances and best practices to perform expanded services or to assume increased responsibilities with existing resources.

Value Added:
Adding to the teaching, research, and service missions of the university through programs, services, and products we provide to improve the environment and quality of life on campus for the entire university community.

Cost Savings:
Seeking ways to reduce expenditures, explore potential cost avoidances, or the ability to maintain expenditures while adding or enhancing services.

EEVACS Nomination Form: Word Doc or PDF


Why EEVACS?

The need to produce education in a cost effective way has led a number of scholars and university administrators to experiment with different techniques for getting people to work faster, smarter and with a customer centered focus. Few of the methods used have been successful because they all focus on staff reductions and getting by with less, while at the same time expanding service delivery. The re-engineered university focuses on looking at established processes and redesigning them in such a way as to be more consistent with established practices. The re-invented university focuses on developing programs that foster and support the core values, mission and vision of the institution. The re-structured/re-organized university focuses on how the university can improve by changing the structure to facilitate decision making and process flow. In re-examining how we produce education, four themes seem to be common to most techniques currently being discussed.

University administrators, parents, legislators, students, faculty and staff all want a university that performs in such a way that it meets or exceeds expectations. Whether getting bills out on time, keeping the buildings and grounds clean, or having books available at the start of class, the expectation is that the university will be effective in basic service delivery. This same group also expects the university to expend the least possible amount of resources in getting a job done or to perform expanded services with the same resources. Efficiency becomes not only an expectation but a requirement in stretching every tuition and state dollar to meet the university's core mission. We must add value to student life and to the teaching, research and service missions of the university through the programs and services we provide to improve the environment and quality of life on campus. Finally, reducing actual cash expenditures through the reduction in operating expenses or in the cost of personnel, and avoiding increases in expenditures when adding or enhancing services is also a common theme in the discussion of how we can do a better job of producing education. This cost savings theme is key to developing a comprehensive approach to having a well run university.

EEVACS was developed because we reject the notion that staff reductions alone will make the university a better place. Human resources are more important and more valuable to a university's growth and reputation than dollar resources. If we are to become a more efficient and effective university that adds value to the teaching and research mission, it will be done with human capital. The ability to effectuate cost savings will come from human resources identifying new efficiencies such as outsourcing and new entrepreneurial opportunities. It will come from human resources deploying new techniques for process redesign such as the Administrative Systems Project, and it will come from human resources working together to build new management configurations such as matrix management to tackle tough problems in half the time. That is the foundation upon which we build EEVACS.

EEVACS AWARD PROGRAM


2011 Winners
Jim Chalk, Custodial, Services
Calvin Foster, Custodial Services
Scott Foltz, Custodial Services
Steve Garrison, Custodial Services
Galen Harring, Custodial Services
David Hayes, Custodial Services
Bibiana Koang, Custodial Services
Doug Stephen, Custodial Services
John Varatti, Custodial Services
Roger Whiteside, Custodial Services
Jeremy Williams, Custodial Services

2010 Winners
Laurel Jinright, Custodial Services
Myong Schabloski, Custodial Services

2008 Winners
Mindy Yost, Environmental Health & Safety
Joyce Dolson, Custodial Services

2007 Winners
Sylvana Airan, Linda Christensen, Katherine Erickson, Janet Hyde, Alliyson Jensen, Marcee Kesslar, Nancy Lewandowski, Jody Melton, Erin Moss, Danae Sizer, Hollyann Swartz, Margaret Warner, Housing
Trevor Lienemann, Facilities Management
Zuleika Doremus, Environmental Health & Safety Naeem Ebrahim, Environmental Health & Safety
Brian Bridges, Custodial Services
Matthew Klipfel, Custodial Services
John Luther, Custodial Services

2006 Winners
Donald Harris, Custodial Services
Andy Martin, Custodial Services
Rita Remmers, Custodial Services
Gina Schilke, Custodial Services
Brian Lubker, Custodial Services
Rita Remmers, Custodial Services